World Food Programme - India    the food aid arm of the United Nations    

             Home      About Us        Policies             Events           Media         Publications      WFP in News      Vacancies          Other Websites          All Documents

 

 

Towards Hunger Free India - Media Coverage

 

26 April 2001, Economic Times, New Delhi, India

 

Scarcity despite plenty: UNWFP tells why

 

Our New Delhi Bureau

 

IN MANY places across India’s countryside, mountains of grain have piled up, often covered with little more than scraps of tarpaulin or plastic sheets. These grain mountains now amount to a little less than 50 million tonnes — about a fourth of all the grain that India produced last year. Yet, as uneaten grain piles up, in many parts of the country people remain chronically undernourished. Results of an extensive study by the United Nations World Food Programme released on Tuesday, throw new light on the paradoxes of India’s food economy.   


The UNWFP says factors like geographical terrain, food imports, market integration, subsidies, health, sanitation and even the quality of water are important factors that affect the availability of food and the degree of nutrition among people.  Another factor, as Amartya Sen and everybody’s grandmother pointed out long ago, is that poor families don’t have the money to buy food, even when there’s enough  to go around. Putting all these factors together, the UNWFP and the M S Swaminathan Research Foundation have compiled a Food Insecurity Atlas of Rural India. 

The Atlas ranks different states according to the level of `food security’ that people have. Punjab, Haryana and Kerala figure as the best fed states.  Unsurprisingly, Bihar and the newly created state of Jharkhand are among the three worst off states. Madhya Pradesh, where chief minister Digvijay Singh’s decentralising reforms are supposed to have made life easier for people figures among the three worst-off states in India in terms of food security. Chhattisgarh, widely believed to be poorer than Madhya Pradesh, does better than MP according to the Atlas. 

A companion volume to the Atlas, called Enabling Development: Food Assistance in South Asia (Oxford University Press, 2001), sums up research on the economics of food in south Asia, including India and its neighbouring countries. It points out that India has come a long way since Partition, when it inherited 82 per cent of the population of undivided India, but only 75 per cent of the cereal farmland. 

Today, enough foodgrain is grown to feed the population, but future trends will depend crucially on whether the dietary habits of increasingly better off Indians stay heavily cereal based, as they are now, or whether they shift to consuming more meat, poultry and dairy foods. Paradoxically, if Indians shift to a more protein-heavy diet, the country’s requirement of grain will go up sharply as enormous volumes of grain will be required as animal feed.  The book argues that, "India will be facing a herculean task if it wants to cover rising domestic demand from its own production."  The UNWFP says governments in India and its neighbouring countries should use food-based aid to boost nutrition and health levels. 

 

 

World Food Programme

2 Poorvi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi – 110057, India

Tel:91-11-26150000, Fax:91-11-26150019

 

Contact:

wfp.newdelhi @wfp.org